The criteria was simple. A gap up over the upper Bollinger Band would signal a short entry. The trade would be exited near the close of the day. Looking back to 1998 in the SPY I was able to identify 79 such instances. There were 43 (54%) winners and 36 losers. The average winner made 0.56% and the average loser lost 0.50%. The profit factor was a modest 1.34.
I then broke it down by instances above and below the 200-day moving average. Above the 200-day moving average there have been 62 instances of a gap up above the Bollinger Band. Shorting these and covering on the close resulted in 53% winners. Winners outsized losers by 0.57% to 0.38%. The profit factor was a decent 1.7.
The trouble occurred with this less than “Outstanding” Gap Band strategy when it was attempted below the 200-day moving average. There were 17 instances. Ten winners, but the average loss was 1.0% vs. an average gain of 0.5%. Overall a losing strategy below the 200ma.
As with previous gap studies, it appears gaps up in long-term downtrends are dangerous to try and short. While it would've worked out on Friday, you always need to be wary of a short-covering rally or trend day up.
Initial results of buying a gap down below the lower Bollinger Band appear better. I will look at them in more detail at a later time.
3 comments:
What parameters are you using for the Bollinger Bands (i.e., what is the ma length and how many STDs)?
thanks –
The default 20ma and 2 Std Devs.
Rob,
Are you taking a peek at my trading system spreadsheet that I use to trade the ES. Are you talking about the previous day's bollinger band because you wouldn't know for sure if today's open was above today's bollinger band until the close since it is based upon the close. (unless this guy has his bollinger bands based upon open prices instead).
Eric (from boucher yahoo group)
Post a Comment