I also provided a spreadsheet with the calculation and a model based on the indicator on the free downloads section of the website.
When conducting research or designing models it’s important to avoid just looking at it from one angle. Today I’m going to explore a couple of other ideas that the indicator / model may have invoked in many of you. I’ve also updated the spreadsheet so that you can see how these ideas were tested as well.
First, a quick refresher chart of last week’s results.
As you can see, utilizing the indicator would have greatly enhanced your returns over time. So if owning the S&P when the Nasdaq is leading is so favorable, does that mean you should short the S&P when the Nasdaq is lagging?
Below is an equity curve of a $100,000 investment doing exactly that. (Interest and dividends are not included.)
After almost 40 years the current (recent?) bear market just got you back into the black. Certainly this isn’t an equity curve that suggests an edge. While some may be surprised based on how positive the previous results were, it makes complete sense. The strategy in this chart calls for shorting the leading index. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen anyone who has suggested that to be a good idea.
But what if instead of buying the S&P when the Nasdaq leads, we buy the Nasdaq? It is the leader after all.
Equity chart below. Hold on to your hats.
Like the original test, dividends are not included. The annual growth rate if you earn 2.5% interest on your cash balance is about 13%. This is more than twice the S&P 500 annual growth rate of under 6% for the period. There’s also lower drawdown and you’d only be in the market a little more than half the time.
Last week we saw how timing the market with this simple indicator can make a big difference. Here you see that a small tweak to ensure you’re in the leading index can juice returns much, much more. There are numerous other tweaks you could add to the model to improve performance or reduce drawdowns further. This is as far as I’m going to take it, though. The spreadsheet is still available and updated with the above tests and charts. You may download the updated version on the free downloads page. I’d suggest anyone who downloads it should use it as a starting point – not a finished product.
For more ideas on using Excel for historical analysis I’d recommend buying Dr. Steenbarger’s Daily Trading Coach book. A few weeks ago I created a sample spreadsheet based on the lessons in that book. You may download that spreadsheet on the free download page as well. Registration is required for the Nasdaq/S&P Lead/Lag Model. Registration is NOT required for the Daily Trading Coach Spreadsheet.
But what if instead of buying the S&P when the Nasdaq leads, we buy the Nasdaq? It is the leader after all.
Equity chart below. Hold on to your hats.
Like the original test, dividends are not included. The annual growth rate if you earn 2.5% interest on your cash balance is about 13%. This is more than twice the S&P 500 annual growth rate of under 6% for the period. There’s also lower drawdown and you’d only be in the market a little more than half the time.
Last week we saw how timing the market with this simple indicator can make a big difference. Here you see that a small tweak to ensure you’re in the leading index can juice returns much, much more. There are numerous other tweaks you could add to the model to improve performance or reduce drawdowns further. This is as far as I’m going to take it, though. The spreadsheet is still available and updated with the above tests and charts. You may download the updated version on the free downloads page. I’d suggest anyone who downloads it should use it as a starting point – not a finished product.
For more ideas on using Excel for historical analysis I’d recommend buying Dr. Steenbarger’s Daily Trading Coach book. A few weeks ago I created a sample spreadsheet based on the lessons in that book. You may download that spreadsheet on the free download page as well. Registration is required for the Nasdaq/S&P Lead/Lag Model. Registration is NOT required for the Daily Trading Coach Spreadsheet.
3 comments:
Thanks for sharing Rob I will definitely look into this further to see if I can squeeze something into my trading arsenal.
Eric
I don't understand how the strategy outperformed from 1981 to 2001. When I look at the chart for the short strategy it looks likes capital peaked at $180,000 in 1981 and bottomed at around $70,000 in 2001. That compounded loss is about 4.5% which should mean that if you stayed in the market you would have earned more than the 2.5%.
Great post. I just can´t figure out what numbers you are using.
spx 2009-05-22 = 908.13
TOS shows this date a H=896,65 and a close 887. Yahoo finance shows the same. The same applies to your nasqadnumbers. Is this the composite or hasdaq100?
Thanx
Post a Comment