I also sliced this a few different ways (above/below 200ma, up/down close, etc.) and found little difference in the results. Despite the low number of instances I find this a compelling setup. You'll also note that on December 7, 2009 I performed the same study on SPY and found compelling results there as well.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Back to Back Outside Days in QQQQ Revisited
Yesterday afternoon the Quantifinder identified an interesting study that I last wrote about in the 3/23/10 blog. It looked at back to back outside days in QQQQ. I’ve updated the study below.
I also sliced this a few different ways (above/below 200ma, up/down close, etc.) and found little difference in the results. Despite the low number of instances I find this a compelling setup. You'll also note that on December 7, 2009 I performed the same study on SPY and found compelling results there as well.
I also sliced this a few different ways (above/below 200ma, up/down close, etc.) and found little difference in the results. Despite the low number of instances I find this a compelling setup. You'll also note that on December 7, 2009 I performed the same study on SPY and found compelling results there as well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Rob, as a relative newb to this blog, could you post an explanation of what the various results columns mean - in layman's terms?
Thanks for the interesting work.
Nice setup Rob. Were the instance spread out over the test period, or clustered?
Tom -
I'm going to do a series soon on how traders can better understand and take advantage of Quantifiable Edges information. I'll be sure to include that.
NZBryant -
From 2000 - 2010 there was at least 1 instance every year except '01. This is the 3rd instance in 2010. 1/6 and 3/22 were the others.
-Rob
Post a Comment